Elizabeth Gaskell's last novel was a delight to read, and I am only sorry that she never lived to finish it. Although the ending seems clear, I would still have wished to drink more of Mrs. Gaskell's prose, until the very last drop. The writing, thought not dense, had enough wit to hold the reader's interest. The plot, like the writing, can seem unremarkable on the surface. But a closer look beneath the surface is all that's needed to see contradictions.
The novel is, essentially, a story of relationships, and this is what makes it timeless. We can all relate to feelings of filial affection, parental intrusion, neighbors' reproofs, and sibling rivalry. While Molly appears to be a docile, sheltered girl, we know that this isn't really case. She has lost her mother, a traumatic experience for any child, although how much it has affected her isn't clear until much later. Her father, Mr. Gibson, marries another woman when Molly is seventeen and just on the cusp of adulthood. When the new Mrs. Gibson and her daughter arrive, that is when Molly's (seemingly) idyllic life is about to be turned upside down. Molly learns the nuances of social conduct. She learns to balance her own moral integrity with the social restraint that is required. She also forms new relationships with the Cumnors and the Hamleys, and her behavior brings her just rewards.
In the DVD's commentary, one of the crew members remarked something to the effect of: "Molly is like the sun, with everything else fanning out from her". I wondered how much of this was true. I think it is true that Gaskell meant for Molly to be the heroine. But what I find more interesting are the peripheral characters. They are more complicated, well drawn characters than Molly. In fact, without them, Molly's character would lose much of the luster that she is credited for.
As Mr. Gibson says in the opening lines quoted in this post, I think it is the "foolish people" in this story who steal the show. There's Osborne, who trangresses beyond all the bounds expected of him, and whose actions accelerate his doom. When Osborne marries a girl far beneath him, and fails in his examinations, he questions his worth in the eyes of his proud father. Even when his mother, Mrs. Hamley, lies on her deathbed, Osborne still fails to confess to her. His relationship with his father deteriorates as his marital relationship bears fruit. As Osborne worsens, his wife gives birth to their son, and the child blossoms in health and vigor. Already there is a sense that the old order is breaking down. The Hamleys' station in the social ladder, as Squire Hamley knows it, will no longer be the same. The aristocracy will be replaced by a new class, and in fact, one that includes foreigners, as Aimee comes to live at Hamley Hall. The 'old order' also includes old ways of social behavior, and virtue. It is implied that it is no longer a world full of innocence, but is rather one ripe with dangers--the dangers of change. Osborne's world of poetry is now being replaced by one of science: the days of chivalry and arthurian Romance will give way to enlightenment's Rationality.
Though raised, like Molly, by a single-parent, Cynthia has had a less sheltered life, which speaks to the status of women in nineteenth-century. Unlike Mr. Gibson who can practice medicine and protect his daughter, Cynthia's mother, Hyacinth, could not do any such thing. The only respectable path open to her was to work as a governess, which meant she had to leave her daughter behind in a school. As Margaret Forster has shown in 'Lady's Maid', it must be very difficult for a woman to secure employment if she had a child of her own. Unsupervised, Cynthia has only herself to turn to for moral guidance. Her mother, occupied with earning her keep, and open to flattery and admiration herself, cannot provide that guidance to Cynthia. So Cynthia falls prey to others' good opinion of her: she craves attention constantly, although she cannot "love deeply " as much as Molly.
Cynthia attracts attention simply by being young, beautiful, and interesting. Young men fall for her more for her beauty than for her wit. They imagine Cynthia as the paragon of womanhood, instead of seeing her for who she is. This masculine definition of her is precisely what she must escape from, but in the absence of a network of women to teach her manners, as Molly has, she becomes a victim. Cynthia is a creation of male fantasies: she is everything men want, and yet, they cannot have her faulty. They elevate her, even when she is fickle, they refute her, even when she says the truth. And as men flock to her, she is blamed for attracting them. Mr. Preston gets aggressive about his demands, even though she keeps refusing him. And Mr. Gibson is unsympathetic to her at one point. While it is easier to forgive Osborne for his scandalous marriage, it is harder to forgive a girl for entangling herself in scandal. This just shows how women can be pliant: Aimee is "sweet and submissive" and so easily controlled, while it is harder to believe that a woman could control a man (e.g. if Cynthia or Molly could control Mr. Preston's apparent vulgarity). Although Cynthia does not love Roger very much, he still pursues her, believing in the image of her instead of the reality. In the end, it is by acknowlegding her fickleness to Mr. Henderson that she gains a partner who now accepts her for who she is. Having learned her mistakes, she vows that she will "place her own happiness before anyone else" in choosing a husband.
If scandal has virtue, we see it in Molly's coming-of-age. Though at the start Molly is inexperienced to matters of sexuality, she changes towards the end. Though docile and proper, and in some ways invisible compared to Cynthia, it is Molly who holds the two biggest secrets at the heart of the novel. She is faithful to her promises of secrecy, and we wonder what would have happened if she acted differently: if she had confessed to Squire Hamley, would Osborne still be alive? If she has confessed her love for Roger, would he still have fancied Cynthia for two years? If she has told her father the truth about Cynthia, would Mr. Gibson have doubted her?
It is important that these secrets pass through Molly because they are necessary for her growing up, for her own "awakening". By knowing Osborne's past, she is aware of a passion that trancends filial duty. Early on, Molly was compared to a little French girl, and this echoes later in the novel, when Molly contact Osborne's French wife, and the two grow close.
Through Cynthia's actions, Molly sees the sincerity and falshood in romantic attachments. She also becomes aware of her love for Roger. She sees that her love for him is constant. His love for Cynthia is steady while Cynthia's wavers. Molly also has a chance to act bravely on behalf of another, to take actions into her own hands, when she helps Cynthia to stave off Mr. Preston. At the same time, she learns that Mr. Preston is not wholly bad. Being in company with Cynthia throws Molly into Mr. Preston's way, which symbolically throws her in the way of sexual awakening.
Finally, it is important to note that towards the end, Molly behaves very much like Cynthia. She is sophisticated, witty, and plays hard-to-get, albeit unintentionally. Molly's earnestly talking to another suitor makes Roger jealous, prompting him to pursue her. The more she resists him, the more he is drawn to her. When Molly falls ill, Roger pays attention to her, in very much the same way he paid attention to Cynthia when she was in low spirits. As Molly grows up in the midst of scandal, and as matters are resolved for the other characters, the novel shows that scandal holds a virtue--a different virtue than one defined by conventional (masculine) terms.
*Pictures credit: Masterpiece Theater
5 comments:
Hmmmm... really interesting take.
I think I have watched the TV series so many times by now that I'm no longer sure of whether I remember the novel correctly or I just go by the script.
What do you think of the ending they had for the TV series? EG had it all too mapped out so she was going towards a similar end. What surprised me, though, is the very ending of the TV series.
I love the way EG takes Molly and Cynthia and makes them learn off each other. She makes Molly more of a 'woman-of-the-world' while she has Cynthia learn some manners and decorum. And Mrs Gibson in the background being all talk no action.
I do think W&D is EG's masterpiece. Just imagine where she could have gone from there! And unlike some other serialised novels, this one doesn't feel like that. George Smith was *very* generous on the terms for W&D and EG no doubt returned him the favour fantastically.
Hi Cristina,
I may have appeared partial to Cynthia in that post. I do like Molly, but I think Cynthia makes for a more interesting study. Though Molly behaves better than Cynthia, I think there is a sense, in the novel, that she must also learn something from Cynthia. Mrs. Gibson isn't one to be envied or emulated, certainly ;)
I thought the ending was very mushy, actually. The scene is rather drippy (literally so) with a rain-soaked Roger proposing to an equally maudlin Molly, who is just short of flinging into his arms. But I think it served the purpose. It was a romantic story, after all, and one must except such things. I didn't mind it too much. In fact, in the last few pages, it is mentioned that it had poured in Hollingford. But I wonder if Gaskell would have liked the scene in the movie.
If you mean Molly and Roger going off to Africa, I think it is a very interesting take, and I appreciate that in the script. Although we do not know what Mrs. Gaskell would have written, I think it is plausible. Westerners were fascinated with Africa. Intelligent, scientifically-inclined women often accompanied their husbands or brothers on expeditions. Women also went on missions to Africa and wrote about their experience.
I liked this novel very much, and I do wish she had written more like this. I've always thought of Gaskell as a social-realism writer, and not so much a social-manners writer. It certainly didn't feel like a serial (and I'd be surprised to learn how that was done!). I could say the same of Bleak House, though the two are *very* different.
Oh, I actually like Cynthia. She has her faults but you can see where they come from so clearly that you can't help but forgive her. Molly, on the other hand, is a little 'pruddish' at first. Cynthia does her a world of good, IMO.
I didn't mind the scene in the rain so much. I found it quite funny and original, actually. Your typical rainy love scene with a twist.
I did mean them going to Africa together. I don't dislike it, though I was utterly surprised when I first saw it. However, I don't think Mrs Gaskell would have written something even remotely similar. Of course I don't know, but I'd imagine a more typical, Victorian, conventional kind of ending.
Mrs Gaskell was way too involved in her community to completely leave out the social-realism. Even in her less social novels (Cranford, W&D) there's a touch of it here and there.
Ah, yes, perhaps the last scene was a little liberal for Victorian sensibilities. But I guess it helps to have the movie 'modern' (with Molly in trousers and all ;))
Cynthia is a creation of male fantasies: she is everything men want, and yet, they cannot have her faulty. They elevate her, even when she is fickle, they refute her, even when she says the truth. And as men flock to her, she is blamed for attracting them. Mr. Preston gets aggressive about his demands, even though she keeps refusing him.
Poor Mr. Preston. He is still being blamed for being Cynthia's chump. Men may have fantasies about her, but she did not hesitate to exploit their fantasy . . . at least Mr. Preston's, when it suited her. And to make matters worse, she refused to face the consequences of her actions and in the end, Mr. Preston is vilified.
Post a Comment